Archive for the 'Stimulus Plan' Category

Mar 27 2009

Profile Image of Neal Katz
Neal Katz

While Perseverance is Good, Brilliant Innovation is Better!

Barack Obama ascended to the Office of the President of the United States due to his incredible perseverance - and BRILLIANT INNOVATION.  Having secured the highest office the focus has now shifted to creating a sustainable economic recovery.  The number one question growing in intensity, volume and magnitude is - How are you going to fund all these wonderful agendas?

Look to the history of the election.  Thinking “outside the box” Team Obama went to the least likely and most underrated source for funding, a populous movement based on small (by traditional political contribution standards almost miniscule) contributions by millions of donors.  This brilliant innovation provided for an involvement and co-ownership of the process that set a new bar for campaigns.  Now is the time to apply this same brilliant innovation to a new monetary policy that funds a sustainable economic recovery and beyond.  This would also address the question, “Mr. President, what are you asking the American public to do”? Continue Reading »

No responses yet

Feb 26 2009

Profile Image of Neal Katz
Neal Katz

To President Obama, After Your Speech

The following letter was sent via USPS mail to President Obama this morning. Please read and add your comments below. If you wish to support our efforts to get this message to Congress and the President, please sign our petition. By signing, you are not endorsing every aspect, only asking that these ideas be considered as a creative solution to a difficult problem.

Continue Reading »

2 responses so far

Feb 26 2009

Profile Image of Neal Katz
Neal Katz

Recently Asked Questions

These questions were asked in the popular forum Daily KOS

This plan is talking about funding the stimulus through bonds. They are just using different words.

Neal: The common thread (I was about to say bond!) between Bank CDs and Corporate or Municipal Bonds is that they are both classified as Debt Instruments. I am not sure why the semantics are the primary focus.

Continue Reading »

No responses yet